The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G is near the bottom of the company’s Mi range of phones above the baseline Mi 11 Lite, which doesn’t have 5G connectivity. It features a 90 Hz AMOLED display with HDR10+ support, and is based on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 780G chipset, backed by 8 GB of memory and up to 128 GB of storage. There are three cameras on the back primary, ultra-wide, and macro modules. It’s the same configuration as the phone’s big sibling, the Mi 11, but different sensors in the modules make for a different performance profile. Read on to find out how the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G performs in our DXOMARK Camera tests. Key camera specifications Primary 64 MP sensor with f/ lens Ultra-wide 8 MP sensor, 119° field of view Macro 5 MP sensor LED flash 4K at 30 fps tested, 1080p at 60/30 fps, 720p at 30 fps About DXOMARK Camera tests For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here. Test summary Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 111 camera 83 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 97 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 85 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 88 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 78 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 70 Best Google Pixel 6 77 36 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 55 Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 61 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 56 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 36 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 85 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 93 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 70 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 85 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 72 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 78 Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Best Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 84 96 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 Position in Global Ranking 83rd 5. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 137 10. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 133 14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 131 14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Exynos 131 14. Vivo X70 Pro MediaTek 131 21. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max 130 30. Samsung Galaxy S22+ Exynos 126 30. Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 126 30. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos 126 34. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 124 34. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G 124 37. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 123 42. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 121 42. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Exynos 121 44. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Snapdragon 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G Exynos 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Exynos 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Exynos 120 44. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Snapdragon 120 53. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G Snapdragon 119 53. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Snapdragon 119 56. Apple iPhone SE 2022 118 56. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G 118 56. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Exynos 118 62. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 117 66. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G Exynos 116 66. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Exynos 116 66. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G Exynos 116 70. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Exynos 115 78. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Snapdragon 112 89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G 109 89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 109 91. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ 108 98. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 106 101. Motorola Edge 20 Pro 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G 105 111. Apple iPhone SE 2020 103 114. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 102 114. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 102 120. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G 97 122. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G 95 124. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 92 127. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 89 128. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G 88 128. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 88 128. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022 88 132. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 87 Position in Advanced Ranking 2nd 6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 106 9. Apple iPhone SE 2020 103 12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 102 15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G 97 19. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 89 Pros Accurate exposure on faces outdoors and indoors, even in backlit scenes Noise generally well controlled down to low light Skin tones generally pleasant Preview exposure for portraits fairly accurate, even in challenging HDR scenes Video detail high Video exposure usually accurate Video stabilization effective Cons Exposure instabilities White balance casts outdoors Frequent autofocus failures Fine detail often lost Exposure instabilities and HDR fusion artifacts in ultra-wide shots Low detail when zooming in Underexposure in night portraits with flash-auto mode Video noise often visible, high in low light and on moving objects With an overall score of 111, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G lands fairly low in our general rankings, but looks much better when compared to phones in its class, tying the top phone in the Advanced segment, the Google Pixel 4a. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G can produce nicely exposed photos, though exposure often varies from shot to shot. Here a color cast is also visible. Its Photo score of 118 misses the top score in the Advanced segment held by the Pixel 4a, with 122 but is still respectable. The main camera can produce accurately exposed photos, but exposure tends to vary from shot to shot, including differences in how well highlights are preserved. A color cast is also usually present in outdoor shots, though skin tones are generally pleasant. Noise is well controlled, though this comes at the expense of fine detail. Autofocus leaves room for improvement. The Zoom composite score of 48 is quite good for the Advanced segment. Like most other phones at this price point, the Mi 11 Lite 5G doesn’t have a dedicated tele module, and image quality drops sharply when zooming in. But wide performance ties the category leader, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. The video score of 101 is also solid for the category, bolstered by strong detail and effective stabilization. The Mi 11 Lite 5G is surpassed in this category so far by only Apple’s iPhone SE 2020 105, but there are compromises at this price point, including autofocus issues and high noise levels. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G is competitive within its category, and though weaknesses are certainly present, they are mostly reasonable compromises given the phone’s price. Below you can find detailed analyses and image samples for all Photo, Zoom, and Video sub-attributes, along with comparisons with two of the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s competitors, the Google Pixel 4a and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Photo The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G achieves a Photo score of 118. In this section, we take a closer look at each sub-attribute and compare image quality against competitors. Exposure and Contrast Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 In these tests we analyze target exposure, contrast, and dynamic range, including repeatability across a series of images. Tests are undertaken in a wide range of light conditions, including backlit scenes and low light down to 1 lux. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s exposure variation over consecutive shots. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, accurate exposure, clipped highlights Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, accurate exposure, better highlight retention Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, better highlight retention but slightly lower exposure Color Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 In these tests we analyze color rendering, skin tones, white balance, and color shading, including repeatability across a series of images. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s color performance in bright light. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, pink cast outdoors Google Pixel 4a, slight cold cast Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, accurate color Autofocus Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 In these tests we analyze autofocus accuracy and shooting time, including repeatability, in the lab. We test focus failures, depth of field, and tracking of moving subjects using perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the autofocus performance of the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, autofocus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, crop missed focus Google Pixel 4a, autofocus Google Pixel 4a, crop accurate focus Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, autofocus Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop accurate focus Texture Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 In these tests we analyze texture on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. This graph shows the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s index quality of texture in the lab. Texture comparison The level of detail is lower than that of the reference devices. Noise Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 In these tests we analyze noise on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s noise performance in outdoor light. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, outdoor noise Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, crop noise visible but light Google Pixel 4a, outdoor noise Google Pixel 4a, crop heavy noise Samsung Galaxy A52 5G outdoor noise Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop noise visible but light Bokeh Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 For these tests we switch to the camera’s bokeh or portrait mode and analyze depth estimation, bokeh shape, blur gradient, and repeatability, as well as all other general image quality attributes mentioned above. The score is derived from perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s bokeh simulation outdoors. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, good subject separation but light blur effect Google Pixel 4a, serious depth estimation artifacts, strong blur effect Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, some depth estimation artifacts, light blur effect Night Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 In these tests we shoot a selection of images in pitch-black darkness as well as with city lights in the background providing some illumination. We shoot sample images with the camera at default settings in both flash-auto and flash-off modes. We analyze all image quality attributes but we pay particular attention to exposure, autofocus, and color. We do not test night modes that have to be activated manually. These samples show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s night performance in flash-auto mode. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, flash-auto underexposure, limited dynamic range Google Pixel 4a, flash-auto correct exposure, clipped shadows Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, flash-auto correct exposure, clipped shadows Artifacts Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 In these tests we check images for optical artifacts such as vignetting, flare, lens softness in the corner, distortion, and chromatic aberrations, as well as for processing artifacts such as ghosting and fusion errors, hue shift, and ringing. These samples shows artifacts in the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s photos compared to competitors. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, artifacts Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, crop strong aliasing on edges Google Pixel 4a, artifacts Google Pixel 4a, crop no visible aliasing Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, artifacts Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop slight aliasing Preview Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 In these tests we analyze the quality of the preview image and the differences between preview images and captured images, particularly in terms of exposure, dynamic range, and bokeh effect. We also check the smoothness of the field-of-view changes in the preview image when zooming with both buttons or when using the pinch-zoom gesture. This graph shows the average face exposure on the preview image. The Mi 11 Lite’s face exposure is accurate in the lab even in high dynamic scenes. Slight underexposure is visible in low light. Both rivals underexpose the face in high dynamic scenes. This graph shows the difference between capture and preview for face exposure. Preview exposure is only slightly different than the captured photo, with highlights clipped more often in preview than capture. The Pixel 4a shows much larger differences, though. Zoom The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G achieves a Zoom score of 48. The Zoom score includes the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were achieved and compare zoom image quality against competitors. Wide Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 In these tests we analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 to 20 mm. We look at all image quality attributes, but we pay particular attention to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. These samples show the performance of the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s ultra-wide camera. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, 16 mm-equivalent shot-to-shot exposure variation, highlights well preserved Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, 16 mm-equivalent shot-to-shot exposure variation, highlights blown out Tele Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 In these tests we analyze all image quality attributes at focal lengths from approximately 40 to 300 mm, paying particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s tele performance in the lab. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, short-range zoom Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, crop fine details lost and heavy aliasing Google Pixel 4a, short-range zoom Google Pixel 4a, crop details well preserved Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, short-range zoom Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop details well preserved Video The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G achieves a Video score of 101. A device’s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of attributes in the same way as the Photo score. In this section, we take a closer look at these sub-scores and compare video quality against competitors. In our Video tests we analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as white balance and color rendering, but we also include such temporal aspects as speed, smoothness and stability of exposure, and autofocus. NOTE The sample video clips in this section are best viewed at 4K resolution. Exposure and Contrast Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 These sample clips show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s video exposure characteristics in indoor conditions. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Fairly wide dynamic range and proper exposure adjustment for face Google Pixel 4a No exposure adjustment for face Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Heavy highlight clipping and visible steps as exposure changes Color Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 These sample clips show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s video color in outdoor light compared to the competition. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Generally pleasant color rendering Google Pixel 4a Slightly inaccurate color rendering Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Quite pleasant color rendering Autofocus Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 These sample clips show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s video autofocus performance. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Frequent refocusing in low light Google Pixel 4a Accurate autofocus Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Visible refocusing in low light Texture Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 This graph shows the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s video texture performance in the lab. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G video texture Detail in videos is quite high. Noise Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 These video stills show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s video noise levels in low light. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, video still Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G, crop visible noise, especially in low light Google Pixel 4a, video still Google Pixel 4a, crop noise well controlled Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, video still Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, crop noise well controlled Artifacts Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Best Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 84 For video artifacts, we check for the same kinds of artifacts mentioned in the Photo section, along with such video-specific artifacts as frame rate variation in different light conditions, judder effect, and moving artifacts artifacts such as aliasing, color quantization, and flare can often be more intrusive when moving than in a still image. This graph shows the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s video exposure time under different lighting conditions, which is related to judder artifacts. Exposure times are low in bright light, but judder is not as bad as it could be. Stabilization Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 In these tests we analyze residual motion when handholding the camera during recording, as well as when walking and running with the camera. We also look for stabilization artifacts such as jello effect, sharpness differences between frames, and frame shift abrupt changes of framing. These sample clips show the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s video stabilization. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Slight residual motion, but sharpness differences between frames often visible Google Pixel 4a, More residual motion Samsung Galaxy A52 5G More residual motion
CompareXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite with our phone comparison tool and get side-by-side specifications. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite Compare phone and tablet specifications of up to three devices at once. Add. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G Add. Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G Add. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
ComparingXiaomi Mi 11 Lite NE 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5G on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite NE 5G stands against Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5G and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for
Comparatif- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G. Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE est sorti en 2021. Son poids est de 158 g et des dimensions sont de 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm. Il dispose d'un écran de 6.55 pouces, d'un appareil photo de 64 MP et mémoire 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM.
Comparatifde caractéristiques, rendement, design, batterie, appareil photo et connectivité entre les mobiles suivants: Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G. L'information complète des spécifications pour décider lequel acheter. Comparatif Xiaomi Mi 11 Global · 8GB · 128GB Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Global · 6GB · 128GB Comparer les fiches techniques
zZV0. 5r9etj7v20.pages.dev/1765r9etj7v20.pages.dev/1325r9etj7v20.pages.dev/1695r9etj7v20.pages.dev/1425r9etj7v20.pages.dev/1635r9etj7v20.pages.dev/2795r9etj7v20.pages.dev/3075r9etj7v20.pages.dev/2655r9etj7v20.pages.dev/113
xiaomi mi 11 lite 5g vs xiaomi mi 11